USPTO serial 88138993
AV AEROVIRONMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AV AEROVIRONMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PEJMAN YEDIDSION
PEJMAN YEDIDSION CONCEPT IP LLP11601 WILSHIRE BLVD FIFTH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacturing of small unmanned air vehicles | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| May 5, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |