USPTO serial 88141587
WHITE WIDOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, PETER T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITE WIDOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Clermont, FL
Clermont, FL
Clermont, FL
Clermont, FL
Clermont, FL
Clermont, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Igel
BRIAN IGEL BELLIZIO + IGEL PLLC305 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Balloons; Balls for games; Bath toys; Battery operated action toys; Beach balls; Board games; Chess sets; Backgammon game sets; Bobble head dolls; Boxing gloves; Bubble making wand and solution sets; Card games; Christmas tree decorations; Collectable toy figures; Construction toys; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Dolls and accessories therefor; Flying discs; Inflatable inner tubes for aquatic recreational use; Inflatable toys; Jigsaw puzzles; Playsets for use with toy action figures and for make believe play battle or adventure activities; Plush toys; Radio controlled toy vehicles; Ride-on toys; Rideable toy vehicles; Snow sleds for recreational use; Swim boards for recreational use; Target games; Toy building blocks; Toy construction blocks; Toy construction sets; Toy gliders; Toy masks; Toy vehicles; Toy watches; Toy weapons; Water squirting toys; Yo-yos; video game consoles; video game machines; Hand held video game units for playing electronic games; video game machines for use with televisions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Giant Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Giant Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Powell, Benny
- Other trademarks owned by Powell, Benny
- Other trademarks owned by Tyndall, Jamie
- Other trademarks owned by Tyndall, Jamie
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WHITE WIDOW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |