USPTO serial 88141808
YOUR PET'S NATURAL GROCER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUR PET'S NATURAL GROCER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, AB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacie K. Smith
Stacie K. Smith Fennemore Craig, P.C.2394 East Camelback RoadSuite 600Phoenix, AZ 85016-3429Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | (1) Pet foods and edible, pet treats, namely, biscuits, bones, cookies and cat nip; (2) pet accessories, namely, beds, houses, cages, carriers, toys, bowls, litter, leashes, collars, scratch posts; harnesses, pulling vests, life and safety jackets (3) Grooming and hygiene accessories, namely, shampoos, conditioners, brushes, combs, coat detanglers, shedders, diapers, stain removers, blood staunchers, scissors, bandages, eye drops, conditioning lotions, hairball removers, clippers, tooth brushes, toothpaste, ear cleaners, slickers, namely, steel pronged brush for medium to long haired pets, flea powders, sanitary napkins. (4) Pet clothing, namely, vests, boots, jackets, costumes and hats. (5) Holistic supplements for pets, namely, vitamins, minerals and herbs. (6) Specialty giftware, namely, animal statutes, greeting cards, mugs, calendars and books of others. (7) Books, manuals and guides | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | 1) Operation of a retail pet supply store and pet supply delivery service. (2) Photography services for pets. (3) Teaching, training and instructional services to pet groomers. (4) Providing adoption services with local animal shelters for the purpose of promoting the adoption of animals. (5) Operation of a day care for dogs. (6) Obedience training services for dogs. (7) Grooming services. (8) Teaching, training and instructional services to dog obedience instructors. (9) Dog clinics, namely, providing instruction on dog grooming, nutrition and health care. (10) Operation of an animal boarding kennel. (11) Information services, namely, providing information on pets to the public via a website (12) Online retail sale of pet products and services, namely, pet food, grooming and hygiene accessories, pet clothing, training devices, pet supplements, training services; (13) Franchise services, namely, offering technical and business management assistance in the establishment and operation of a retail pet supply store (14) Interactive training and consultation in store and online in the field of pet health and nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |