USPTO serial 88142060
QRS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HSU, FONG
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QRS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronni S. Jillions
Ronni S. Jillions Browdy and Neimark, PLLC1625 K St. N.W., Suite 550Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatuses and instruments for use in pulsed magnetic stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, transpelvic magnetic stimulation, and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation; physiotherapy devices, namely, pulsed magnetic stimulation devices, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy devices, transpelvic magnetic stimulation devices, and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation devices; magnetic field therapy devices, namely, apparatus for magnet therapy; ray therapy devices, namely, X-ray apparatus for medical purposes, X-ray diagnostic apparatus, Sensory light therapy unit; analysis devices for medical purposes, namely, Medical diagnostic instruments for the analysis of body fluids, Apparatus for blood analysis, Medical devices for monitoring oxymetory, gas analysis and vital signs.; blood analysis devices, namely, apparatus for blood analysis; diagnosis devices for medical purposes, namely, Ultrasound diagnostic apparatus, X-ray diagnostic apparatus, Medical instrument for cardiovascular diagnostics; electrodes for medical purposes; laser for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printing office products, namely, Label printing machines, Paper for printing photographs, Printing types; teaching material, except for devices, namely, printed training materials in the field of pulsed magnetic stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, transpelvic magnetic stimulation, and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation; books in the field of pulsed magnetic stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, transpelvic magnetic stimulation, and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation, newspapers and magazines in the field of pulsed magnetic stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, transpelvic magnetic stimulation, and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services; health care for men and animals; Health care services, namely, magnetic field therapy treatment services; physical therapy and electro-therapeutic treatments; services of a hospital; physiotherapeutical treatments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QRS International AG
- Other trademarks owned by QRS International AG
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named QRS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |