Drawing for SABRE

USPTO serial 88148370

SABRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SABRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase Rd.Lackenbach Siegel Bldg.Scarsdale, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Aeronautical engines, namely, air-breathing rocket engines and rocket propulsion engines for spacecraftACTIVE—
012Aeronautical apparatus, machines and appliances, namely, rockets; space vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 18, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 1, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2020DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 16, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 16, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 18, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 18, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 19, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance