USPTO serial 88148557
ADVANCED MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YI, CRYSTAL HAEIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANCED MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT D. SWANSON
SCOTT D. SWANSON SHAVER & SWANSON, LLPP.O. BOX 877BOISE, ID 83701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Advanced welding systems in the nature of electric welding machines; automated electric arc welding machines; automated welding machines and systems in the nature of electric welding machines; automated machine tools and automated equipment, namely, lathes, machine tools for welding, electric arc welding machines, welding torches, metal welding saws and cutters; integrated welding systems, namely, comprised primarily of electric welding machines and also featuring integrated controllers, equipment, and weld fixtures specially adapted for electric welding machines; precision weld holding fixtures in the nature of machine parts for electric welding machines, namely, electric linear seam welders, weld lathes, manipulators, gantries, positioners, turn tables, turning rolls, weld chambers, roll planishers, tracks and carriages, and custom designed equipment for welding; auxiliary power units for supplying electrical power in automated welding systems; high frequency arc starters in the nature of starters for electric arc welding machines; specialized welding torches and weld heads in the nature of electric welding machine parts | ACTIVE | Jul 24, 1989 |
| 009 | Electronic controllers for welding machines; electronic controllers, namely, weld process controllers and modules for automated welding systems; weld process control hardware and downloadable software; electronic modular, multiprocessor, and networked system controllers for automated welding systems; downloadable software for controlling, administrating, and documenting welding process; individualized configured system control packages comprised primarily of electronic controllers for welding machines; structural parts for electronic controllers for welding machines, namely, individual control components for electronic controllers for upgrading and retrofit applications; structural parts for electronic controllers for welding machines, namely, control platforms for arc voltage control, housing wire feeders, mechanical and magnetic oscillation, laser and mechanical seam tracking, linear travel, rotation travel, and thermal sensing | ACTIVE | Jul 24, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |