USPTO serial 88151695
PAXXUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2020
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PAXXUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Owner
ADDISON, IL, US
ADDISON, IL, US
Rollprint Packaging Products, Inc.
Addison, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by Rollprint Packaging Products, Inc.
ADDISON, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles C. Valauskas
230 W. Monroe St., Suite 2210CHICAGO, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Flexible packaging materials primarily composed of aluminum foil and also including plastic films, papers, and non-woven polymeric fibers; Sterilizable pouches primarily composed of aluminum foil and also including plastic films, papers, and non-woven polymeric fibers, for use in packaging to store healthcare products, namely, medical devices, pharmaceutical products, medical diagnostic equipment, and biological products for human use; Pouches primarily composed of aluminum foil and also including plastic films, papers, and non-woven polymeric fibers, for use in connection with packaging for medical devices | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2019 |
| 010 | Plastic flexible films for medical use | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2019 |
| 016 | Plastic flexible packaging film; flexible packaging materials primarily composed of plastic films and paper, and also including aluminum foil and non-woven polymeric fibers; flexible packaging materials primarily composed of plastic films and paper, and also including non-woven polymeric fibers; packaging for barrier systems primarily composed of plastic films and paper, and also including aluminum foil and non-woven polymeric fibers; packaging for barrier systems primarily composed of plastic films and paper, and also including non-woven polymeric fibers; Sterilizable pouches primarily composed of plastic films and papers, and also including aluminum foil and non-woven polymeric fibers, for use in packaging to store healthcare products, namely, medical devices, pharmaceutical products, medical diagnostic equipment, and biological products for human use; Sterilizable pouches primarily composed of plastic films and papers, and also including non-woven polymeric fibers, for use in packaging to store healthcare products, namely, medical devices, pharmaceutical products, medical diagnostic equipment, and biological products for human use; Pouches primarily composed of plastic films and papers, and also including aluminum foil and non-woven polymeric fibers, for use in connection with packaging for medical devices; Pouches primarily composed of plastic films and papers, and also including non-woven polymeric fibers, for use in connection with packaging for medical devices | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2019 |
| 040 | Custom fabrication of films, foils, papers, and non-woven materials both in unprinted and printed, and single and multiweb form | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PAXXUS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PAXXUS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Rollprint Packaging Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PAXXUS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named PAXXUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |