Drawing for SENSIGHT

USPTO serial 88154636

SENSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAN DEN ABEELEN, DEREK C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline Zion

Jacqueline Zion PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER BARATZ LLP1500 BROADWAY, 12TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital and non-digital weapon tactical laser and optical lens sights, telescopic sights, optical lens scopes; optical lens scope component, namely, a reticle; rifle scopes; binoculars; telescopes; range finders for firearms; tactical laser, telescopic, and optical lens gun sights and directional compasses; optical sights for guns and archery and optical lenses for distance measurement; tactical laser, telescopic and optical lens firearm sights; gun scopes; day and night vision binoculars, monoculars and goggles, laser range finders; self-Luminous Day and Night Riflescopes; optical lens sights; red dot sights in the nature of optical and telescopic lens sights; optical weapon sights; optical lens sights; computer based rifle sighting systems, namely, a computer software application to be used together with digital weapon sights and sensor, for recording, monitoring, tracking, navigating, training, posting, sharing and analyzing data, audio and video used with said digital and non-digital weapon sightsACTIVE—
042Upgrading, maintenance and repair of computer software; software as a services (SAAS) featuring a computer software Application for monitoring, tracking, analyzing, displaying, and storing data, audio and video used with digital and non-digital weapon sights; analytical and statistical analysis services relating to data, audio and video used with digital and non-digital weapon sights; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for monitoring, tracking, analyzing, displaying, and storing data, audio and video used with digital and non-digital weapon sightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 11, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance