USPTO serial 88156740
IDOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 2020
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with IDOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Germantown, WI, US
Germantown, WI, US
Oak Brook, IL, US
Oak Brook, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan Michaels
Megan Michaels CROWELL & MORING LLPP.O. Box 10395Chicago, IL 60610United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Controller systems for loading docks, warehouse shipping and receiving areas, manufacturing distribution areas and truck transfer areas and components thereof, namely, equipment for installation at a loading dock, consisting of dock levelers, powered vehicle restraints, electric overhead doors door openers, powered ramps, truck levelers, powered safety barriers, in the nature of powered vehicle stops and restraints, toe guards, and powered loading dock seals | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2018 |
| 009 | Intelligent controller systems for loading docks, warehouse shipping and receiving areas, manufacturing distribution areas and truck transfer areas and components thereof, namely, wireless and network routers, modems, computer network bridges, control panel lights and loading dock light communication systems in the nature of lighting control panels, LED loading dock light controls, loading dock strobe lights in the nature of flashing safety lights, cameras, electric sensors in the nature of motion sensors, light sensors, fork truck sensors, fluid level sensors and door operator sensors, control panels in the nature of electric control panels, lighting control panels and integrated control systems for loading dock equipment, signal lights in the nature of loading dock light communication systems, alarms in the nature of loading dock and loading dock equipment alarms, electronic dock leveler controls in the nature of control panels for dock levelers, in-line velocity fuses, dock mounted pumps and motors in the nature of electronic controls for pumps and motors, fluid logic blocks in the nature of logic circuits, recessing lip cylinder and push button controls in the nature electrical controlling devices, electronic truck restraint control in the nature of control panels for truck restraints, light sequencing controls in the nature electrical controlling devices, equipment interlocking controls in the nature electrical controlling devices, remote power packs in the nature of hydraulic pump stations for operating one or more hydraulic dock levelers or vehicle restraints, rear impact guard (RIG) sensor bars in the nature of electric sensors, lighting communication systems, comprising LED lights and strobe lights for communicating between loading dock and vehicle driver, overhead door controls in the nature of electric actuators, electronic locks, power controllers, electronic transmitters and receivers for controlling door operators, keypads for use with door operators and electronic card readers, and access control and alarm monitoring systems, and computers; computer software for opening doors, controlling machinery, operating lights, collecting loading dock data, conducting equipment diagnostics and communicating with remote data collection devices | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Systems LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Systems LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Systems LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Systems LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IDOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 12, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |