USPTO serial 88158482
DUST STOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUST STOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne F. Downey
Anne F. Downey Harter Secrest & Emery LLP50 Fountain PlazaSuite 1000Buffalo, NY 14202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | sealer coating, dust proofer in the nature of a penetrating sealer coating and primer all for use on concrete, brick, limestone, block, drywall, wood and all porous exterior surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |