USPTO serial 88159850
INFRAPIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2022
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with INFRAPIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer C. Debrow
Jennifer C. Debrow Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP80 South 8th Street2200 IDS CenterMinneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Medium density and high density rigid polyethylene pipe for water infrastructure, mining, industrial process and oil and gas distribution; plastic-based piping systems comprised of rigid wall and profile wall pipes, fabricated fittings and structures for infrastructure applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships featuring plastic based piping systems for infrastructure applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Infra Pipe Solutions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Infra Pipe Solutions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Infra Pipe Solutions Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named INFRAPIPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 16, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |