Drawing for NOODLE LAND

USPTO serial 88160044

NOODLE LAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOODLE LAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine Ross

KATHERINE ROSS ROSS IP GROUP PLLC5050 QUORUM DRIVE, SUITE 700DALLAS, TX 75254UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Noodle-based prepared meals; Noodles; Noodles and sauce mixes combined in unitary packages; Noodles and seasoning mixes combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and processed vegetables combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and topping combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, dehydrated vegetables, and topping combined in unitary packages; Noodles, seasonings, edible oil, and dehydrated vegetables combined in unitary packages; Noodles, seasonings, edible oil, and flavorings combined in unitary packages; Asian noodles; Bean-starch noodles (harusame, uncooked); Chinese noodles; Chinese rice noodles (bifun, uncooked); Chow mein noodles; Fried noodles; Instant noodles; Instant chinese noodles; Instant soba noodles; Instant udon noodles; Meal kits consisting primarily of noodles; Pad thai (Thai stir-fried noodles); Ramen (Japanese noodle-based dish); Ramen noodles; Rice noodles; Soba noodles; Somen noodles; Starch noodles; Stir-fried noodles with vegetables (Japchae); Udon noodlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance