USPTO serial 88162039
MYWILSON.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADCLIFF, BRENT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYWILSON.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seocho-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Lyhus
JOHN E. LYHUS FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP120 S. LASALLE STREETSUITE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60613Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer program based on artificial intelligence for collection, analysis, processing, storage of big data; Computer program for collection, analysis, processing, storage of big data; Software based on artificial intelligence for collection, analysis, processing, storage of big data; Computer software application for collection, analysis, processing, storage of big data; Computer software application based on artificial intelligence for collection, analysis, processing, storage of big data; Computer software platforms based on artificial intelligence for collection, analysis, processing, storage of big data; Software platforms for collection, analysis, processing, storage of big data; Network server based on artificial intelligence; Network servers of software platforms for collection, analysis, processing, storage of big data; Data security apparatus based on artificial intelligence in the nature of security token hardware, ; Big data security apparatus in the nature of security token hardware, cards encoded with security features for identification purposes; Apparatus for processing data based on artificial intelligence in the nature of computer hardware, computer peripherals; Apparatus for processing big data in the nature of computer hardware, computer peripherals, sensors for temperatures, acceleration, velocity, positions, distances and telecommunications hardware and recorded software for monitoring and alerting remote sensor status via the Internet; Computer software developmental tools for data analysis, data mining, artificial intelligence, learning and study of machines; Computer software for learning and study of machines in the field of transaction processing for statistical analysis and production of announcement and report; Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Computer based on artificial intelligence; Computer for collection, analysis, storage of big data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |