USPTO serial 88162225
MYWILSON.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYWILSON.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seocho-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Lyhus
John E. Lyhus FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP120 S. LASALLE STREETSUITE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60613Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Global Positioning Systems (GPS) navigation services based on artificial intelligence; Providing traffic information; Advisory services relating to transport based on artificial intelligence; Provision of transportation information based on artificial intelligence; Providing information relating to vehicle parking based on artificial intelligence; Air traffic control services based on artificial intelligence; Storage of foods, agricultural products, livestock products, marine products based on artificial intelligence; Storage of pharmaceuticals based on artificial intelligence; Warehousing of hazardous materials based on artificial intelligence; Storage of waste based on artificial intelligence; Transport services for sightseeing tours based on artificial intelligence; Providing transport for guided tours based on artificial intelligence; Providing transport for guided tours based on big data; On-line transportation reservation services based on artificial intelligence; On-line transportation reservation services based on big data; Provision of travel information based on artificial intelligence; Provision of travel information based on big data; Physical storage of electronically stored data or documents based on artificial intelligence; Distribution of energy based on artificial intelligence; Distribution of energy based on big data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |