Drawing for CORNELIA CRENSHAW MOTHER OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN MEMPHIS

USPTO serial 88162749

CORNELIA CRENSHAW MOTHER OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN MEMPHIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORNELIA CRENSHAW MOTHER OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN MEMPHIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua A. Schaul

Joshua A. Schaul GARVEY ADAM LLP19900 MacArthur BoulevardSuite 530Irvine, CA 92612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment, namely, production of talk show; Entertainment, namely, a continuing talk show broadcast over web-based video streaming services; Providing online interviews featuring talk show guests in the field of current events, civil rights, and historical events for entertainment purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 25, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 24, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 7, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 4, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2019RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Jan 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance