USPTO serial 88163023
VISUAL PAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISUAL PAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROY D. GROSS
ROY D. GROSS THE ROY GROSS LAW FIRM, LLC50 WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 737/745NORWALK, CT 06854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical inspection apparatus, namely, optical inspection apparatus for the human body; Diagnostic apparatus and device for the detection of diseases, namely, handheld or non-handheld computerized apparatus and device for the optical detection of epithelial lesions; Screening apparatus and device for the detection and diagnosis of diseases, namely, handheld or non-handheld computerized apparatus and device for the optical detection and diagnosis of epithelial lesions; Optical image detection apparatus, namely, handheld or non-handheld computerized apparatus for detection of epithelial lesions; Software for diagnostic devices, namely, downloadable software or software recorded on computer media for diagnosis of lesions in images of epithelial tissue; Diagnostic and screening system comprised of optical and electronic hardware, namely, smartphone with powerful optics, ultra-bright light source, lens enabling magnification for enhanced visualization, rechargeable long-lasting battery, and software for operating, installing, testing, diagnosing and managing the forgoing diagnostic and screening systems; Mobile device using optical detection technology, namely, mobile devices for capturing images of epithelial tissue to detect lesions therein; Downloadable computer software or computer software recorded on computer media for the in vivo analysis and investigation of tissues for use in the field of inspection of epithelial tissue for the existence of lesions; Downloadable computer software or computer software recorded on computer media for the analysis of tissues for use in the field of inspection of epithelial tissue for the existence of lesions; Electronic display interface, namely, touch screen unit comprised of touch screens for showing video and real time in vivo analysis and investigation of tissues. The above referenced goods are not for collecting and diagnosing information from PAP smears | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |