Drawing for OCUITY AQ

USPTO serial 88165524

OCUITY AQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCUITY AQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel Jacques

RACHEL JACQUES MASCHOFF BRENNAN1389 CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 300PARK CITY, UT 84098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical imaging apparatus, namely, ophthalmic cameras for medical purposes in the nature of an anterior segment camera and system for use therewith, sold as a unit comprised of a camera, tablet computer, dock and operating software in the field of eye care; Eye care medical devices, namely, eye testing machines; Medical diagnostic eye care devices, namely, medical imaging device for eyes; Medical imaging devices for eyesACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for viewing, editing, and manipulating images for use in connection with medical diagnostic eye care devices and medical imaging devices for eyesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2023ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2023ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 2, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 22, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 12, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 12, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 12, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance