USPTO serial 88165998
INTELLIGENT STREET LAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHWAB, CHAU CRISTIA H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLIGENT STREET LAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
JOHN W. MCGLYNN RATNERPRESTIA2200 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARDSUITE 350KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical circuits and circuit boards; Automatic control apparatus; Programmable controllers; Electronic controllers; Network management control apparatus; Network controlling apparatus; Interfaces for computers; Lighting control apparatus; Electric sensors; Optical sensors; Sensors for determining position; Remote, electric and electronic control stations; Regulating apparatus, electric; Checking apparatus and instruments; Storage apparatus for computer programs; Encoded keys; Encoded key cards; Cards encoded with security features for identification purposes; Radio transceivers; GPS transmitters; GPS receivers; Computer hardware for the processing of positioning data; Computer software for the processing of positioning data; Computer software for the collection of positioning data; Software to control building environmental, access and security systems; Security control apparatus; Electric safety monitoring apparatus; Electric alarms; Electrical access control apparatus; Access control devices; Access security apparatus; Apparatus and instruments for accumulating and storing electricity; Apparatus for recording data; Navigating apparatus; Apparatus for the transmission of images; Wireless communication devices for voice, data, or image transmission; Cameras; Active infra-red sensors; Passive infrared detectors; Infrared remote control apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |