USPTO serial 88167855
FRANZ VIEGENER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSCATI, JUSTIN RONALD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRANZ VIEGENER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Buenos Aires, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Holman
JOHN C. HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST., NW, STE. 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Shower heads; shower head sprayers; hand held shower heads; shower enclosures; porcelain sanitary ware, namely, lavatories, lavatory bowls, lavatory seats, bidets, toilets and toilet seats; bath tubs; kitchen and bathroom faucets; plumbing fittings, namely, traps, valves, drains and spouts | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Shelves; non-metal clothes hooks; bathtub grab bars not made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Towel bars; towel rings; soap dishes; toilet tissue holders; toothbrush holders; shower grab bars not made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |