USPTO serial 88168006
ENERGYOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERGYOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheila Fox Morrison
Sheila Fox Morrison DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1300 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2400PORTLAND, OR 97201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer operating systems; computer operating system software for distributed systems; computer software for connecting, operating, and managing networked components within energy transmission and distribution systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the adoption and acceptance of open source computer technologies through the promotion of common industry standards for software and hardware development | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Developing voluntary common industry standards for software and hardware development; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software and firmware for connecting, operating, and managing a distributed system platform; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for connecting, operating, and managing networked components within electricity transmission and distribution systems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for software development featuring software development kits (SDKs); software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software development tools; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as application programming interfaces (APIs) for connecting, operating, and managing networked components within energy transmission and distribution systems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use to connect and control internet of things (IoT) electronic devices; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for connecting, operating, integrating, controlling, and managing networked electronic devices via wireless networks; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for others to use for the development of software for connecting, operating, integrating, controlling, and managing internet of things (IoT) electronic devices; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as an application programming interface (API) for connecting, operating, and managing networked components within energy transmission and distribution systems;software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for communicating between computers and electronic devices; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use as application programming interfaces and software development kits, both used to enable others to develop software applications; providing an internet website portal offering information on software development; software development consulting; technical support services in the field of software development, namely, installation, administration and troubleshooting problems of hosted software applications and database applications; computer software design and development; developing and updating computer software; maintenance, repair and updating of computer software; providing a website featuring technical information relating to computer software provided; providing computer software consulting services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing and repairing computer software problems; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data via electronic communications networks; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software to enable users to program, organize and access audio, video, text, multimedia content and third-party computer software programs; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information, websites, and other resources available on global computer networks for others using information technology; searching and retrieving information, websites, and other resources available on global computer networks and other electronic communication networks for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property rights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Avista Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ENERGYOS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |