USPTO serial 88168083
WRIGHT'S W
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 2021
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WRIGHT'S W?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spring, TX, US
Spring, TX, US
Spring, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terry L. McCutcheon
Terry L. McCutcheon MATTHEWS, LAWSON, MCCUTCHEON & JOSEPH, PLLC2000 BERING DRIVE, STE 700HOUSTON, TX 77057UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Oil and gas well equipment, namely, oil and gas equipment used for conducting well operations, namely, for use in drilling, completion, through-tubing completion and work-overs, fishing and structural removals, production, intervention, stimulation, maintenance, pressure well control, blow-out prevention and well control, decommissioning, cementing, plug and abandonment, on land and offshore, namely, cement blending machines, work string machines for handling spooled tubing deployment and retraction, tensioner machines for use with work string machines for handling spooled tubing, hydraulic power tongs, mechanical powered cutting machines, subsea injection machines, powered subsea torque machines, oil well pumping and drilling machines and slurry blender machines for use in oil or gas well hydraulic fracturing operations | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |