USPTO serial 88168493
GLOWYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURDECKI, ANNA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOWYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tony Hom
Tony Hom Law office of Tony Hom81 70 St81 70th StBrooklyn, NY 11209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Baby swings; Body-building apparatus; Candle holders for Christmas trees; Children's dress up accessories, namely, toy helmets for play; Dolls for Christmas; Electronic action toys; Electronic novelty toys, namely, toys that electronically record, play back, and distort or manipulate voices and sounds; Positionable wooden and plastic figures for use in wooden and plastic puzzles; Skateboard trucks; Skipping ropes; Toy building blocks capable of interconnection; Toy drones; Toy furniture; Toy houses; Toys for domestic pets; Toys, namely, children's dress-up accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zhejiang Horizon Industrial Design Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Zhejiang Horizon Industrial Design Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GLOWYE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2020 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |