USPTO serial 88168906
BONALMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUMMERY, MARY M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BONALMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CIUDAD DE BUENOS AIRES, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert David Baker
8500 Lincoln Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flour; Sauces; Dried pasta; Filled pasta; Fresh pasta; Prepared pasta; Spaghetti sauce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |