USPTO serial 88172969
DIG IT IN THE SUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIG IT IN THE SUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Nemmers
James C. Nemmers SHUTTLEWORTH & INGERSOLL, PLC115 3RD STREET SE, SUITE 500CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | UV METERS, NAMELY, PERSONAL UV SUNLIGHT SENSORS; UV METERS, NAMELY, PERSONAL UV SUNLIGHT SENSORS IN THE FORM OF STICKERS OR WRISTBANDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |