USPTO serial 88174764
PRO-ELASTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO-ELASTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bill C. Panagos
BILL C. PANAGOS PANAGOS LAW GROUP PLLC3331 WEST BIG BEAVER ROADSUITE 102TROY, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | HVAC products made from flexible closed cell polyurethane foam materials, namely, non metallic ducts, air management baffles, air management seals, air management trim, cellular plastic ducts, evaporator liner in the nature of liner for air conditioner evaporators; Products made from flexible closed cell polyurethane foam materials, namely, range hood liner | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automotive parts made from flexible closed cell polyurethane foam materials, namely, body seals, seals for dampening buzz, squeak, rattle (BSR), console bin mats, cowl to body side molding, cup holder inserts, door latch covers, door water shields, fender liners, fender silencers, gas tank pad in the nature of adhesive foam pads specially adapted for motorcycle gas tanks for rider protection, glove box liners, automotive headliners, spare tire cover as part of load floor, vehicle trunk liners, wheel housing barrier in the nature of wheel well liner | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Products made from flexible closed cell polyurethane foam materials, namely, A, B, C pillar insulation for automobiles, architectural acoustic products in the nature of sound absorbers, sound deadeners, acoustic insulation, automobile weatherstripping in the nature of cowl seals and cowl screens, car door foils in the nature of insulation, car door insulation, door trim insulation, felt absorbers for insulating and absorbing sound, foam absorber in the nature of soundproofing foam, seals for HVAC pipe connections, automotive hood liner in the nature of sound deadener, gasket for license plate holder, gaskets for mirror, noise insulation, gasket for reducing noise vibration harshness in automotive HVAC system, seals for reducing noise vibration harshness in automotive HVAC system, masking film for use when painting automobile trim, soundproofing materials, gaskets for automobile tail lamps | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom compression molding manufacturing using flexible closed cell polyurethane foam materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Unique Fabricating, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Unique Fabricating, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named PRO-ELASTIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |