USPTO serial 88176365
AIKANA ESTHETIC CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIKANA ESTHETIC CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SPRINGFIELD, VA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, retreats, camps and field trips in the field of skin beauty, body beauty, massage therapy, and cosmetic make up and distribution of training material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting workshops and classes or seminaries in the fields of cosmetic make up, skin beauty treatments and massage therapy and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting workshops and classes or seminaries in the field of cosmetic make up, skin beauty treatments and massage therapy and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing seminaries and workshops in the fields of skin beauty and treatments and massage therapy; Providing classes, workshops, seminars and camps in the field of beauty care, as face care, skin care and massages | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty spa services, namely, cosmetic body care; Day spa services, namely, nail care, manicures, pedicures and nail enhancements; Health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit; Health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health club facility; Health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort; Health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit, namely, providing massage, facial and body treatment services, cosmetic body care services; Health spa services for health and wellness of the mind, body and spirit; Health spa services for health and wellness of the mind, body and spirit offered in or from a remote, mobile or temporary on-site location; Health spa services, namely, body wraps, mud treatments, seaweed treatments, hydrotherapy baths, and body scrubs; Health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services; Health spa services, namely, laser treatments for acne, rejuvenation, scars, tattoo removal and for facials and massage; Health spa services, namely, providing weight loss programs; Medical spa services, namely, minimally and non-invasive cosmetic and body fitness therapies | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |