USPTO serial 88176405
GIRLS GUIDE TO GREATNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIRLS GUIDE TO GREATNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed books in the field of self-help | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2020 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |