USPTO serial 88176928
CLOUDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GIPSOV, MARYNA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOUDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dollard-des-Ormeaux, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
Molly Buck Richard RICHARD LAW GROUP13355 NOEL ROAD, SUITE 1350DALLAS, TX 75240UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for processing materials for dentistry, namely, Computer Numerical Control machines for manufacturing dental restorations based on data from 3D scanners; 3D laser milling machines; 3D Printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | 3D scanners for dental laboratory, 3D intro-oral scanners for dental clinic; Furnaces for molding dental material to create dental restoratives for laboratory use; Computer software for scanning, designing and manufacturing dental restoratives; 3D visualization and 3D analysis software for use in the dental field. Downloadable cloud-based digital dental solution computer software platform for managing electronic data related to the entire life-cycle of surgical, orthodontic and prosthetic clinical cases from their initial diagnostic stage to their final treatment and rehabilitation; computer software and programs for integrating clinical data generated from laboratory scanners, intro-oral scanners, shade scanning devices, facial scanners, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Digital X-trays; computer-aided manufacturing software (CAM) to create dental restoratives; software for managing various workflows related to the planning, designing and manufacturing of clinical cases; software for integrating various workflows, materials, equipment and manufacturing infrastructures into the dental platform | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical and dental apparatus for dimensional measurement, namely, 3D intro-oral scanners for dental clinic | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of software and hardware for scanning, computer- aided designing (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) for use in the dental field; development of cloud-based computer software for use in database management including communication and transmission of data, case planning, case manufacturing process and quality control; design and development of software for the management and distribution of knowledge within the artificial intelligence platform in relation to data management, planning management, process development management and quality management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2021 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |