Drawing for SUBLUE

USPTO serial 88176937

SUBLUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, SHA-KARA ELOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUBLUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin S. Costanza

Kevin S. Costanza SEED IP LAW GROUP LLP701 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Publicity services; Distribution of publicity materials (flyers, prospectuses, brochures, samples, particularly for catalogue long distance sales) whether cross border or not; Promoting the goods and services of others; Promoting for others, namely, sales promotion for others; Goods import-export agencies; Advertising through all public communication means; Demonstration of goods; Marketing Services; Demonstration of products; Online advertising via a computer communications networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 29, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 12, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance