USPTO serial 88180910
PITA INN EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON II, COLLIER L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PITA INN EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randy Micheletti
RANDY MICHELETTI INCUBATE IP366 PEMBROKE LN. #8GLEN ELLYN, IL 60137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Baba ghanoush; Falafel; Hummus; Hummus chick pea paste; Salads, namely, Jerusalem salads; Salads, namely, tabouleh salads; Salads, namely, yogurt salads; Salads, namely, fatoush salads; Salads, namely, chicken fatoush salad; Soups; Combination meal consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entree and a soup or salad for consumption on or off the premises; French fries; Shish kabob | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; Coffee and tea; Coffee-based beverages; Pastries; Pita; Pita bread; Pita chips; Rice; Sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, kabob sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, falafel sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, shawarma sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, kibbeh sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, shish kabob sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, kefta kabob sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, beef shawarma sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, chicken tender sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, spicy chicken tender sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, lamb kabob sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, chicken shawarma sandwiches; Sauces; Tea; Tea-based beverages; Tea-based beverages also containing mint; Tea-based iced beverages; Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a tea base; Iced tea; Prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; Steamed rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Catering; Catering services; Restaurant and café services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services featuring sandwiches; Restaurant services featuring Mediterranean and Middle Eastern cuisine; Restaurant services featuring halal food; Restaurant services featuring entrees; Restaurant services featuring desserts; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Fast-food restaurant services; Food and drink catering; Providing progressive dinner events where participants sample meals and drinks at a series of restaurants; Providing of food and drink via a mobile truck; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |