USPTO serial 88181568
K KALOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEAN, JULES J.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with K KALOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ENRIQUE (RICK) SANCHEZ JR
ENRIQUE (RICK) SANCHEZ JR WHITAKER CHALK SWINDLE & SCHWARTZ PLLC301 COMMERCE ST, SUITE 3500FORT WORTH, TX 76102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical spa services, namely, elective, minimally and non-invasive cosmetic and body fitness therapies | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |