USPTO serial 88183816
KETOCHARGED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KETOCHARGED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson NOLTE LACKENBACH SIEGEL1 Chase Rd.Scarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Triglyceride esters for use in the manufacture of food; Medium chain triglycerides-based emulsion for use in the manufacture of dietary and nutritional supplements; medium chain triglycerides derived from coconuts for use in the manufacture of dietary and nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Ketone ester beverages for use as a dietary supplement; ready to drink medium chain triglycerides for use as a nutritional supplement; ready to drink medium chain triglycerides for use as a nutritional supplement for addition to coffee, smoothies and protein shakes; natural and healthy ketone ester drink to increase the ketogenic effect and the bioavailability of medium chain fatty acids for use as a dietary supplement; Medium chain triglycerides-based emulsion for use as a dietary and nutritional supplement; medium chain triglycerides derived from coconuts for use as a dietary and nutritional supplement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |