USPTO serial 88184692
FULL SPECTRUM ENGAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 14, 2020
- Examiner
- RADCLIFF, BRENT
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with FULL SPECTRUM ENGAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baltimore, MD, US
Baltimore, MD, US
Columbia, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger H. Bora
Roger H. Bora THOMPSON HINE LLP10050 INNOVATION DRIVE, SUITE 400Miamisburg, OH 45342United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology consultancy services in the fields of cyber security and computer network security; information technology consulting services in the fields of computer science, data encryption, data management, cyber security, fraud, terrorism, intelligence analysis, threat analytics, analyzing computer networks to identify malicious threats, identifying computer network and computer system vulnerabilities, identifying suspicious behavior with potential to compromise computer systems, and computer threat detection; providing computer security consultancy in the nature of security compliance reporting, security intelligence and log management for cyber security and computer network security; providing information in the fields of cyber security and computer network threats; computer security consultancy; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; computer network and information technology services in the nature of computer security consultancy and data security consultancy namely, cyber security engineering, creating policies and strategies to defend against cyber security and computer network threats; maintenance of computer software and computer systems relating to computer security and prevention of security risks; computer system design services, computer software design in the nature of computer system and computer network architectural design services in the fields of cyber security and computer network security; testing of computer software and testing of computer hardware in the nature of computer system and computer network test and evaluation services for cyber security and computer network threat analysis; updating of computer software relating to computer security and preventions of computer risks; research, design, development of computer software, computer firmware, computer hardware, computer systems and computer architectures and customization of computer software, computer firmware, computer systems and computer architectures for cyber security and computer network threats and defense; technology consulting services in the fields of computer software and consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware, namely, systems development, engineering, integration, data engineering, data processing and data analytics for cyber security and computer network security; providing information, advice and consultancy in the nature of cyber security and computer network security relating to computer security, computer network security and communications network security; cyber security, computer network security and internet security consultancy in the nature of technical support and consulting services in the fields of cyber security and computer network security and computer network vulnerability of computers, computer systems, computer networks, computer hardware, computer software applications, digital devices, digital data, and mobile devices; information technology security consulting services in the nature of information integration and risk assessment relating to cyber security; Computer-aided engineering services for others in the field of cyber security and computer network security; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for cyber security for the detection of evidence of malware, computer viruses, network irregularities, security breaches, and persistent threats from third party sources | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |