Drawing for ROCKET GROW LED CLEAN, COOL, EFFICIENT

USPTO serial 88185275

ROCKET GROW LED CLEAN, COOL, EFFICIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKET GROW LED CLEAN, COOL, EFFICIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Light Emitting Diode (LED) plant grow light; Lights for use in growing plants; Aeroponic grow cabinet in the nature of a closed environment with lights, exhaust system, aeroponic misting chamber and automated control system; Hydroponics grow box in the nature of a closed environment equipped with lights, exhaust system, hydroponics growing container and odor control systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 13, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 13, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 13, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 9, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 30, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 16, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 15, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance