USPTO serial 88185334
SPOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINSON, JENNIFER ELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Graif
Michael R. Graif MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Water test and analysis kits for laboratory, scientific, consumer and commercial purposes comprised of electronic-based instruments for measuring environmental parameters of water quality in the nature of an opto-electronic wireless communication-enabled reader, for measuring regulated water contaminants including lead, chlorine, bacteria, nitrates, pesticides, water hardness, pH, metals, biologics, pharmaceuticals, and hormones, for consumer laboratory environmental, and industrial scientific water analysis, and also comprising a sample collection and preparation sample container filled with a preservative in the container for use in the environmental testing field, immunoassay strips, test strips for testing water quality; downloadable computer application software for smart phones, tablets, and laptop computers for monitoring, analyzing, and reporting water quality and promoting mitigation solutions and community activation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Water analysis services consisting of water assay services to determine contaminant levels of different elements; water analysis services; water quality control services; analysis of water quality; monitoring of water quality; technical quality monitoring services of water conditions; chemical and microbiological water analysis services; chemistry services, namely, chemistry-based testing services for consumer, scientific and laboratory purposes, namely, water quality analysis; quantification, measuring, and testing for scientific purposes, namely water quality analysis; providing scientific analysis and preparing related informational reports based upon results of testing in the field of water analysis; computer software services, namely, software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring, analyzing, and reporting of water quality; providing a website over a global computer network featuring information on monitoring, analyzing, and reporting of water quality; environmental testing services consisting of environmental assay services , namely, quantitative and qualitative biochemical and electrochemical assays to determine contaminant levels of different elements; computer software services, namely, software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring, analyzing, and reporting of environmental quality factors, namely, lead, chlorine, bacteria, nitrates, pesticides, water hardness, pH, metals other than lead, biologics, pharmaceuticals, and hormones; providing a website over a global computer network featuring information on monitoring, analyzing, and reporting of environmental quality factors, namely, water quality | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Microlyze Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SAFESPOUT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFESPOUT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPOUT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |