USPTO serial 88185386
AMERICA'S DEBATE COACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2020
- Examiner
- MCCARTHY, BRIDGET ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AMERICA'S DEBATE COACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chad W. Brigham
Chad W. Brigham GOLDENBERG HELLER & ANTOGNOLI, P.C.2227 S. STATE ROUTE 157EDWARDSVILLE, IL 62025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic publications and media, namely, downloadable reports, articles, podcasts, blogs, editorials, newsletters and interviews in the field of debate, persuasion, argumentation, communication, and public speaking | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2020 |
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services, namely, conducting and providing programs, classes, instruction, seminars, lectures, conferences, workshops, podcasts, and television, radio and multimedia broadcasts in the field of debate, persuasion, argumentation, communication, and public speaking and featuring debate, persuasion, argumentation, communication, and public speaking topics and information; professional teaching, training, and instruction services in the field of debate, persuasion, argumentation, communication, and public speaking; professional educational services, namely, programs, classes, courses, seminars, lectures, speeches, tutorials, lessons, conferences, and workshops in the field of debate, persuasion, argumentation, communication, and public speaking | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |