Drawing for PL PET LUXURY BECAUSE THEY'RE WORTH IT

USPTO serial 88189858

PL PET LUXURY BECAUSE THEY'RE WORTH IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
β€”
Examiner
SHEN, ELIZABETH S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PL PET LUXURY BECAUSE THEY'RE WORTH IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam Rodriguez

Adam Rodriguez Bleakley, Platt & Schmidt, LLP1 North Lexington AvenueWhite Plains, NY 10601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics for animals; Shampoos for animalABANDONEDβ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited Β§2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2019MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATIONβ€”
Oct 15, 2019ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATIONβ€”
Oct 10, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVEDβ€”
Aug 16, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDβ€”
Jul 30, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILEDβ€”
Jul 30, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILEDβ€”
Jun 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEβ€”
Jun 11, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERβ€”
Jun 11, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDβ€”
Jun 11, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDβ€”
Jun 11, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDβ€”
Jun 11, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENβ€”
Jun 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERβ€”
Feb 25, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action β€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVEDβ€”
Feb 19, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERβ€”
Nov 30, 2018MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILEDβ€”
Nov 29, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDβ€”
Nov 15, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDβ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance