USPTO serial 88192528
WILLOW TWIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILLOW TWIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorraine Linford
Lorraine Linford COZEN O'CONNOR999 3RD AVENUESUITE 1900SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Electronic building automation installations for remote control of connected devices, namely, computer hardware and software installed in buildings, for monitoring elevators, HVAC equipment, building access control devices, temperature sensors, human movement sensors, network infrastructure and networked devices in the Internet of Things (IoT); Electronic digital automation installations for remote measuring of connected devices in buildings, comprised of computer hardware and software for monitoring elevators, HVAC equipment, building access control devices, temperature sensors, human movement sensors, network infrastructure networked devices in the Internet of Things (IoT); Electronic digital building automation systems, that provide access to building data via a digital twin interface, comprised of sensors connected to building automation and control (BAC) networks for monitoring elevators, HVAC equipment, building access control devices, temperature sensors, human movement sensors, network infrastructure and networked devices in the Internet of things (IoT) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Section 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Business services, namely, analysis of facility operations and operational efficiency in a building or other facility, and providing recommendations to facility managers; Business services, namely, analysis of infrastructure operation in a building or other facility and maintenance thereof, including for the purposes of monitoring contractual performance | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Section 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that provides computerized generation of digital three-dimensional representations of buildings and other facilities; providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to access real-time data regarding operational status of physical devices connected to a computer network within a building or other facility; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that provides a three-dimensional virtual representation of a building or other facility; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that collects and analyses data and provides recommendations for optimization of power consumption in buildings and other facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WILLOW TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by WILLOW IP PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by WILLOW IP PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WILLOW TWIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |