USPTO serial 88192773
LIKE NO OTHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIKE NO OTHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy J Benjamin
AMY J BENJAMIN BENJAMIN LAW PC111 EAST 14TH STREETSUITE 469NEW YORK, NY 10003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Artificial sweeteners; erythritol | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Almond butter; apple puree; apple sauce; candied fruit; canned fruits; chocolate nut butter; cocoa butter; fruit bars being fruit based meal replacement bars and fruit based raw food bars; fruit compotes; fruit fillings; fruit jam; fruit based fillings for fruit pies; fruit preserves; fruit spreads; honey butter; gelatins sweetened with erythritol; marmalades and jams | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Almond confectionery being almond cake, almond cookies, almond candy and marzipan; barbecue sauce; bubble gum; candies; candy mints; candy with caramel; candy with cocoa; chewing gum; chili sauce; chocolate; chocolate candies; chocolate confectionery; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate covered pretzels; chocolate mousses;chocolate sauce; chocolate spreads containing nuts; chocolate syrup; confectionery crystal sugar pieces; confectionery fondants; confectionery fruit jellies being fruit jelly candy; hot chocolate; hot sauce; ketchup sauce; mint for confectionery; natural sweeteners; peppermint candy; peppermint for confectionery; salad dressings; salad sauces; sauce mixes; sauces for barbecued meat; sriracha hot chili sauce; sugar-free candies; sugar -free chewing gum; sugarless candies; sweets in the form of candy; toffee candies; tomato sauce; Worcestershire sauce; cranberry sauce; lollipops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |