Drawing for EFM

USPTO serial 88194743

EFM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EFM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

tony hom

tony hom accolade ip limited81 70 StBrooklyn, NY 11209-1113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042(Based on Intent to Use) Computer security consultancy; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Data encryption services; Electronic data storage; Engineering; Physics research; Research and development of new products for others; Scientific and technological services, namely, conducting technical project studies in the field of data encryption services; Telecommunications technology consultancy(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Computer security consultancy; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Data encryption services; Electronic data storage; Engineering; Physics research; Research and development of new products for others; Scientific and technological services, namely, conducting technical project studies in the field of data encryption services; Telecommunications technology consultancyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 1, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 1, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 3, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance