USPTO serial 88196958
WARRIOR MADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WARRIOR MADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Leeds Edelman
205 E 95TH ST, APT 11ENEW YORK, NY 10128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line, non-downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for electronically tracking personal health, wellness and fitness goals and for providing reports and alerts concerning said goals; providing on-line, non-downloadable computer e-commerce software in the nature of a mobile application to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network related to consumer goods in the fields of health, wellness and personal fitness; providing a website featuring technology that enables users to electronically track personal health, wellness and fitness goals and to generate reports and alerts concerning said goals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 23, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 23, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |