USPTO serial 88197535
THE CURL COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2021
- Examiner
- LEE, REBECCA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THE CURL COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cambridgeshire, GB
Cambridgeshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRITTANY S SMITH
BRITTANY S SMITH BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair lotions; hair care preparations; shampoos; hair care lotions; hair conditioners; hair colorants; hair dyes; hair gel and hair mousse; hair sprays; hair oils; hair straightening preparations; hair curling preparations; hair styling spray; hair wax; presentation and gift sets incorporating some or all of the aforesaid goods, namely, gift sets consisting primarily of various combinations of some or all of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |