Drawing for NEULAND

USPTO serial 88199524

NEULAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SABAGH, LAILA TAREK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEULAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee Sacks

LEE SACKS LAW OFFICES OF LEE SACKS, APC324 SOUTH BEVERLY DRIVE, SUITE 496BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and video recordings featuring music and artistic performancesACTIVENov 19, 2018
041Production of sound and music video recordings; providing an Internet website portal in the field of musicACTIVENov 19, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 30, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 19, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 18, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance