USPTO serial 88200061
BUSBOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BUSBOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip L. Nulud
Philip L. Nulud Buchalter, A Professional Corporation1000 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Use in Commerce) Printed circuit boards; Breadboards, namely, a construction base for prototyping of electronics; Electrical wires and connection fittings therefor; Circuit board hobby kits; Toy electronics kits; Battery boxes and electric batteries; Online retail services, namely, online sale of printed circuit boards, breadboards, toy electronic kits, circuit board hobby kits, electrical wires, battery boxes, electric batteries, electrical resistors, capacitors, and transistors; operation of an online bulletin board for publishing of information about electronic engineering, electronic circuits, printed circuit boards, how to select electrical components, determining the rating for prototyping electronic components, and tips and traps for design and manufacturing of electronic components, and for users to provide commentary about the content or about subjects relating thereto; Electrical enclosures, namely, enclosures made of plastic designed to house electrical controls, instruments and components; Electrical enclosures, namely, enclosures made of aluminum designed to house electrical controls, instruments and components; Microprocessor development boards; (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Electrical components, namely, electrical resistors, capacitors, transistors, diodes, and integrated circuits; Microcontrollers; Mounting brackets, nuts and bolts for electrical apparatus; Wireless communication devices for voice, data or image transmission; Radio transmitters, clocks, radio receivers, radio telephones, radio signal tuners, amplifiers, preamplifiers and loud speaker systems, tape recorders, record playing equipment, and kits composed of combinations of the aforementioned items and structural parts therefor; Design and development of custom printed circuit boards for others; Educational services, namely, providing educational modules, classes, workshops, and training in the fields of electronic engineering, electronic circuits and printed circuit boards; Hosting a website for on-line forums and live and downloadable audio and video broadcasts through the on-line website in the fields of electronic engineering, electronic circuits and printed circuit boards; entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts and video on demand transmissions for hobbyists in the fields of electronic engineering, electronic circuits and printed circuit boards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 29, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |