USPTO serial 88201167
NFCO.BLAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NFCO.BLAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene Bolmarcich
Gene Bolmarcich LAW OFFICES OF GENE BOLMARCICH107 N LAKE SHORE DRBROOKFIELD, CT 06804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; Bar soap; Non-medicated Bath soaps; Non-medicated Body soaps; Non-medicated Laundry soaps; Non-medicated liquid soaps; Shaving soap; Soap for brightening textile; Non-medicated Soap powders; Non-medicated soap solutions; Non-medicated Soaps for personal use; Non-medicated Soaps in liquid form; Non-medicated cosmetic soap in the nature of Sugar soap; Baby shampoo; Bath shampoo; Non- medicated Hair shampoo; Shampoos for animals; Shampoos for human hair; Shampoos for personal use; After sun moisturizers; Body moisturizers for the skin; Cosmetic skin moisturizers; Eye moisturizers for cosmetic use; Facial moisturizers; Hair moisturizers; Moisturizers for the face, body and hands; Abrasive media for kitchen cleaning purposes; Bathroom cleaning preparations; Cleaning preparations for bathroom use; Cleaning preparations for laundry use; Antiperspirant deodorants; Body deodorants; Deodorant preparations for personal use; Detergents for household use; Dishwashing detergents; Laundry detergent; Sunscreen preparations; Non-medicated lip balms; After shower creams; After sun creams; Aftershave creams; non-medicated Babies' creams; Cosmetic Body creams; Cosmetic acne creams; Cosmetic creams; Face foundation creams; Hand cream; Aftershave gels; Bath gels, not medicated; Cosmetic eye gels; Gels for use in the bath; Gels for use in the shower; Hair gel; Facial wipes impregnated with cosmetics; Wipes impregnated with cleaning or polishing preparations; Wipes impregnated with cosmetic lotions; Non- medicated bath salts | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |