USPTO serial 88207088
AZURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AZURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Zuber
Thomas F. Zuber ZUBER LAWLER LLP350 S GRAND AVE, 32ND FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Dried herbs, all the foregoing not containing any goods noncompliant with the federal Controlled Substances Act or the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Dried herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials; Dried herbs, all the foregoing not in violation of the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Dried herbs, all the foregoing excluding any products that violate the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Federally-lawful dried herbs; Dried herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials including, among others, materials derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Dried herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials such as lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, among others; Processed herbs, all the foregoing not containing any goods noncompliant with the federal Controlled Substances Act or the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Processed herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials; Processed herbs, all the foregoing not in violation of the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Processed herbs, all the foregoing excluding any products that violate the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Federally-lawful processed herbs; Processed herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials including, among others, materials derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Processed herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials such as lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, among others; Candy, all the foregoing not containing any goods noncompliant with the federal Controlled Substances Act or the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Candy, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials; Candy, all the foregoing not in violation of the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Candy, all the foregoing excluding any products that violate the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Federally-lawful candy; Candy, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials including, among others, materials derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Candy, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials such as lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, among others; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods, all the foregoing not containing any goods noncompliant with the federal Controlled Substances Act or the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods, all the foregoing not in violation of the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods, all the foregoing excluding any products that violate the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Federally-lawful bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials including, among others, materials derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials such as lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, among others; Chocolate, all the foregoing not containing any goods noncompliant with the federal Controlled Substances Act or the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Chocolate, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials; Chocolate, all the foregoing not in violation of the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Chocolate, all the foregoing excluding any products that violate the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Federally-lawful chocolate; Chocolate, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials including, among others, materials derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Chocolate, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials such as lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, among others; Gum sweets, all the foregoing not containing any goods noncompliant with the federal Controlled Substances Act or the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Gum sweets, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials; Gum sweets, all the foregoing not in violation of the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Gum sweets, all the foregoing excluding any products that violate the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Federally-lawful gum sweets; Gum sweets, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials including, among others, materials derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Gum sweets, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials such as lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, among others | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Raw herbs, all the foregoing not containing any goods noncompliant with the federal Controlled Substances Act or the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Raw herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials; Raw herbs, all the foregoing not in violation of the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Raw herbs, all the foregoing excluding any products that violate the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Federally-lawful raw herbs; Raw herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials including, among others, materials derived from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Raw herbs, all the foregoing containing only federally-lawful materials such as lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, among others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |