USPTO serial 88209345
COSMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COSMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent P. Johnson
Brent P. Johnson Berg Hill Greenleaf & Ruscitti1712 Pearl StreetBoulder, CO 80302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer games, namely, computer game software; video games, namely, video game software; computer software for video games and for video games machines; computer programs for creating video and computer games; video discs, computer hard discs, audio tapes, video cassettes, compact discs, all containing computer games; CD-ROMs containing computer games; software for playing video, computer and on-line games; software for enabling video, computer and on-line games to be run on multiple platforms; downloadable software for developing, designing, modifying and customizing video, computer and on-line games; computer game software for use on mobile phones; downloadable electronic publications, namely, newsletters, books, and periodicals, all in the field of computer games and entertainment, downloadable from databases on the Internet; downloadable computer game software; downloadable video game software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |