USPTO serial 88209432
SABOR REAL COMIDA AUTENTICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SABOR REAL COMIDA AUTENTICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly A. Wright
KIMBERLY A. WRIGHT REVOLVE LAW GROUP LLP2601 MAIN STREETSUITE 1200IRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen, prepared or packaged meats and ready to eat meals in the nature of ready-to-eat beef, poultry, pork, seafood; marinated, pre- cooked and raw meats, namely, beef, poultry, pork and prepared seafood; ready to eat, refrigerated and frozen Mexican style prepared meats, namely, beef, poultry, pork and seafood; frozen, prepared and packaged meats and ready to eat meals primarily of meat served with fresh and/or frozen vegetables, rice, and/or beans | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Ready to eat meals, frozen meals, and refrigerated meals, consisting primarily of rice and also including beans, corn, vegetables; marinades, sauces; Thickening agents for use in cooking, seasonings, sauces; spices; Mexican food flavorings, other than essential oils; preparations made from corn, rice, flour and cereals, namely, corn-based snack food, rice-based snack food, cereal based snack food, and flour-based chips | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2020 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |