Drawing for FRESH FRUIT PARLOUR KUDAMONO CAFE

USPTO serial 88210207

FRESH FRUIT PARLOUR KUDAMONO CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH FRUIT PARLOUR KUDAMONO CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joe McKinney Muncy

Joe McKinney Muncy MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Bar information services; Bar services; Bartending services; Coffee-house and snack-bar services; Juice bar services; Mobile café services for providing food and drink; Providing information in the field of drinks, namely, providing information about bartending; Providing information in the nature of recipes for drinks; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of dining; Providing temporary accommodation; Providing a website featuring information in the field of recipes and cooking; Providing of food and drink; Providing of food and drink via a mobile truck; Provision of exhibition facilities; Rental of beach chairs, towels and umbrellas for recreational use; Rental of cooking apparatus; Rental of cooking equipment for industrial purposes; Rental of kitchen sinks; Rental of meeting rooms; Rental of small kitchen appliancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance