USPTO serial 88210681
KING STREET HONOLULU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KING STREET HONOLULU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
JOSEPH V. MYERS III SEYFARTH SHAW LLP1075 PEACHTREE STREET NESUITE 2500ATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Banana chips; Dairy-based spreads; Food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit; Fruit-based snack food; Nut-based snack foods; Nut-based spreads; Potato chips; Prepared nuts; Processed nuts; Roasted nuts; Soy chips; Trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, and also including granola; Vegetable chips; Whey chips; Apple chips; Cassava chips; Fruit chips; Kale chips; Plantain chips; Yuca chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bakery goods, namely, bread, loaf bread, bread pudding, sliced bread, coffee cakes, bread rolls, cluster rolls, individual rolls, sandwich rolls, sweet rolls; Barbecue sauce; Candy; Candy bars; Coffee; Cookies; Frozen soy-based desserts; Grain-based food bars; Granola-based snack bars; High-protein cereal bars; Ketchup; Marinades; Muesli bars; Mustard; Non-dairy frozen confections; Noodles; Quinoa-based food bars; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; Salad dressing; Sandwiches, namely, breakfast sandwiches, ready to eat sandwiches; Sauces; Spice rubs; Stuffing mixes containing bread; Trail mix consisting primarily of granola, and also including processed nuts; Pounded rice cakes (mochi); Sweet pounded rice cakes (mochi-gashi) | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juice; Fruit smoothies; Water beverages; Bottled water; Drinking water | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring bakery goods, bakery products, bread, rolls, coffee | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by King's Hawaiian Holding Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named KING STREET HONOLULU
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |